Pages
Archives
Links
Why ACORN is Unworthy of Our Hard-Earned Tax Dollars and Chief Organizer’s Toilet Talk Proves It
A federal court of appeals overturned Clinton-appointee Judge Nina Gershon’s ruling that claimed the government had the right and responsibility to fund ACORN.
Thank God, in light of the latest antics from ACORN Chief Organizer Berth Lewis. While applauding the Young Democratic Socialists, she said, “Any group that says, ‘I’m young, I’m Democratic, and I’m a socialist,’ is all right with me.”
I’m glad the real socialists, with the ear of our government, are finally standing up to be counted.
The Tea Parties, which Lewis called a “bowel movement,” are bringing America into a phase that will surpass Jim Crow, McCarthism and the Japanese internment camps of World War II.
This woman, who has overseen an organization and employees accused and/or convicted of voter registration fraud in well over a dozen states, has no shame.
Lewis’ actions, both past and present, show why her organization isn’t worthy of our hard-earned tax dollars.
“We’re on life support,” Lewis told reporters after her court appearance. And the plug can’t be pulled fast enough.
Posted in Uncategorized Leave a comment
Ohio State Students Only A Pawn In SEIU’s Unionizing Game
The Service Employees International Union has been waging a long-running campaign against food service provider Sodexo, with the ultimate goal of unionizing the company. SEIU’s modus operandi is if a company doesn’t bend to the union’s will, the smear machine gets cranked up and the company is attacked. In this case, it’s the food service provider for the college football and basketball stadiums. Liberty Chick provides more coverage here.
As pawns in SEIU’s unionizing game, 20 Ohio State University students were arrested for blocking a major campus street, according to the union-sympathizing campus newspaper, The Lantern.
After meeting with the university president, the union pawns claimed he “was rude and hardly let us talk.”
On High Street, the students sat in the crosswalk, facing the potential of being struck by traffic. But, likely in their minds it was justified – whatever it takes to accomplish SEIU’s goal!
The mission statement for Service Employees International Union is to “improve the lives of workers and their families to create a more just and humane society.” And coordinated chants of “si se puede!” and “yes we can!” echoed the protestors’ collective commitment to those ends.
Collective commitment? How about lemming-like mentality to enable the SEIU in securing more dues-payers? President Obama, call your office: SEIU has stolen your slogan!
The OSU protest is of particular interest to the movement. “Ohio State is the largest university in the country,” Sanchez said. “It has the power to influence others.”
This is standard fare for SEIU and its likes, such as ACORN – go after the biggest and make them the example. Consider a story Wade Rathke, founder of ACORN (and former SEIU Local 1100 head), told in an article entitled, “Leveraging Labor’s Revival: A Proposal to Organize Wal-Mart:”
At the first negotiating session in March 2004 between H&R Block and ACORN in New Orleans, when the parties were trying to settle a series of disputes concerning predatory products being promoted among lower income families, the chief spokesman for H&R Block asked a question that was both straightforward and to the point, “Are we here today because we are the biggest or because we are the worst?” The answer then was easy—because they were the biggest.
In that example, as likely the case at OSU, culpability and “wrongs” we’re ultimately the issue – the size of the institution was.
We’ll have to see if SEIU is successful in organizing the huge corporation. The union’s attacks must certainly be having their desired effect. What also remains to be seen is if critically-thinking students, at esteemed institutions of higher learning such as Ohio State University, will allow themselves to be used as pawns in SEIU’s unionizing game.
Posted in Uncategorized Leave a comment
Sunlight on SEIU Part V: SEIU Target Bank of America is Recipient of Huge Interest Fees From the Union
Back in 2008, the SEIU took out a $90-plus million loan to fund its campaign activities, most notably, to elect Barack Obama president of the United States.
Since that time, the union has been incurring huge interest fees. Consider these, just from 2009:
| Entity | Purpose | Amount |
| Bank of America – San Francisco | “Investment and Bank Charges” | $59,645 |
| Bank of America – Dallas | “Interest Expense” | $494,594 |
| Bank of America – Chicago | “Interest Expense” | $180,570 |
| Bank of America – Chicago | “Interest Expense” | $2,482,701 |
| Bank of America – Texas | “Interest Expense” | $734,303 |
| TOTAL | $3,951,813 |
A couple weeks ago, I explained that SEIU is preparing a major offensive against Bank of America, its largest creditor. The likely reason is to either pressure the bank into forgiving some of the huge principle on the loan or to negotiate a more favorable interest rate.
When the union spends nearly $4 million in interest payments alone, it’s no wonder it’s doing whatever it can to get out from under that burden.
With the exception of ObamaCare, the union has little to show for its investment in electing the current government. Only if it can pass immigration reform and card check will the union have more access to new lines of revenue (read: more unionized workers).
Posted in Uncategorized 1 Comment
Sunlight on SEIU Part IV: Union, ACORN Intertwined Before – and After – ‘Pimp and Prostitute’ Video Scandal
It was common knowledge that SEIU and ACORN were of the same tree prior to the James O’Keefe/Hannah Giles coast-to-coast video sting. At ACORNcracked.com, I chronicled nearly two dozen SEIU contributions to ACORN in just a few years.

In 2009, SEIU gave to a variety of ACORN affiliates both before and after the sting videos began to be released. Consider these:
| Entity | Purpose | Date | Amount |
| ACORN Labor Partnership | “Support for organizing” | 4/2009 | $37,878 |
| Community Labor Organization Committee | “Support for organizing” | 1/2009 & 3/2009 | $73,682 |
| New Orleans Worker Resource Center | “Organizational Support” | 1/2009 – 6/2009 | $134,000 |
| Wal-Mart Alliance for Reform Now | “Support for organizing” | 1/21/2009 | $20,000 |
| WARN | “Support for organizing” | 1/2009 & 3/2009 | $44,000 |
| Brooklyn ACORN | “Contribution” | 7/23/2009 | $25,000 |
| Citizens Services Inc | “Support for political activities” | 4/2009 – 9/2009 | $165,536 |
The last one, Citizens Services Inc, is particularly interesting, given that CSI was the entity Obama for America also hired for campaign work, as Michelle Malkin pointed out.
SEIU 1199, the largest local affiliate of the national union (and former employer of White House Political Director Patrick Gaspard), gave a whopping $550,000 to the Working Families Party in 2009. WFP was co-founded by ACORN.
The national SEIU also made expenditures to the National Public Pension Coalition, an outfit that “supports state-based activities in defense of public employee defined benefit pension systems,” according to a job posting for the executive director position.
The American Federation of Teachers listed other members of the coalition, “in addition to the AFT, are the AFL-CIO; the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; Change to Win; the National Education Association; and the Service Employees International Union.”
The Center for American Progress Action Fund was the recipient of a $236,036 contribution from the SEIU. The Economic Policy Institute, the “think tank” or “issue advocacy group,” according to the financial filing, receives huge financial support from organized labor and surprise-surprise, produces economic data favorable to…….organized labor!
The Chicago-based Gamaliel Foundation – the organization that gave a young Barack Obama his start in community organizing – received $100,000 in the middle of 2009. The organization’s views are in line with ACORN, they’re just a little more diplomatic in how they go about it.
The SEIU’s contributions to Healthcare for America Now surpassed the one-million mark with an additional $550,000 in financial support. SEIU’s and HCAN’s efforts proved successful when ObamaCare finally passed the Congress.
The free Huffington Post received $15,000 in “subscription services” from SEIU.
This is America. SEIU can spend its money however it wishes. Previously, we compared the Marxist Andy Stern’s compensation to that of his secretary. The reality is, the union could increase the wage disparity ten-fold and I could care less.
What I have a problem with is Andy Stern using the “power of persuasion” to change our economic system when he won’t enact those principles voluntarily at his own union. Until you live up to your own principles, Andy, I will fight you at every turn.
Posted in Uncategorized Leave a comment
Sunlight on SEIU Part III: Understand Media Matters’ Funders, Understand Media Matters’ Targets
Media Matters has operated as a vile organization attacking all things non-progressive: Republicans, Tea Partiers, conservatives, non-progressive media. So it should come as no surprise that Media Matters’ ire rises most when its funders are attacked.
Most notably, Media Matters will trash all things non-progressive and in turn, its funders will cite Media Matters. Case in point? AFL-CIO’s Rich Trumka recently gave a speech in which he said, “We are working to counter the Glenn Beck effect and turn anger into action for real change.”
AFL-CIO then linked to a Media Matters article about Fox News. Additionally, Media Matters promoted its funder’s speech before a Harvard University audience.
Another? Media Matters has consistently defended SEIU.
An Investor’s Business Daily editorial advanced the false claim that Andy Stern, president of Service Employees International Union (SEIU), “is the most frequent visitor to the White House.” Moreover, IBD attacked Stern for saying, “[W]orkers of the world unite (is) not just a slogan anymore; it’s a way we are going to have to do our work,” and claimed, “In SEIU’s worldview, there is no room for dissent. Karl Marx, call your office”; however, IBD ignored that Stern has also said it’s “good news” that “communism’s dead.”
Consider this small group of funders:
- Service Employees International Union – 10/09 and 11/09 – $50,000
- National Education Association – 8/19/09 – $100,000
- AFL-CIO – 10/23/08 – $25,000
Perhaps the best way to get on Media Matters’ good side is to throw them a little coin. I wonder if they have a Muscle for Money program like ACORN did?
So if you’re looking to avoid Media Matters’ crosshairs, send a check to:
David Brock, executive director
Media Matters for America
455 Massachasetts Ave. NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20001
Tell him Kyle sent you.
Posted in Uncategorized 12 Comments
Sunlight on SEIU Part II: SEIU’s White House Go-To Man Still on Union Payroll in 2009
Earlier last year, ACORN founder Wade Rathke glowingly blogged that Patrick Gaspard, political director of the White House, was a former ACORN organizer. When that claim started receiving a bit of attention, Rathke offered a retraction, saying his memory was playing tricks on him. Right, Wade, right…
What is indisputable about Patrick Gaspard is that at one time, he was the Executive Vice President of SEIU Local 1199, the New York City-based chapter that is the largest of all SEIU locals. At some point in late 2007 or early 2008, Gaspard allegedly left SEIU to join the Obama campaign.
Obama won the primary, and ultimately the general election, and Gaspard was named the Director of Political Affairs in the White House – a heady and important job.
So it should give transparency and clean government advocates a bit of concern to see in calendar year 2009, Gaspard received a whopping $37,191 from SEIU 1199. Assuming he officially became a federal employee on January 20th (Inauguration Day), it amounted to nearly $2,000 a day in compensation.
Gaspard left the SEIU to join the Obama campaign – which presumably was more than a full-time job – then became an upper-level staffer during the transition. But apparently all the while, he was still on the SEIU dime.
And as he was making arrangements to occupy an office in the West Wing, he was still on the SEIU payroll. It causes one to wonder: who is Gaspard serving?
Posted in Uncategorized 1 Comment
Sunlight on SEIU Part I: Marxist Andy Stern’s Compensation Would Have Karl Marx Spinning in His Grave
SEIU heavy Andy Stern has often been quoted saying, “Workers of the world unite – it’s not just a slogan anymore. It’s the way we’re gonna have to do our work.”
According to the latest LM-2 financial report filed with the federal Department of Labor, Stern’s 2009 compensation totaled $306,388. By comparison, the “Executive Secretary to the President,” Doris Butler, received a paltry $48,666.

Another strong proponent of Marxist principles – in fact, the co-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America – SEIU Executive Vice President Eliseo Medina took home a cool $242,286. Fellow frequent White House visitor and SEIU Secretary-Treasurer Anna Burger? $252,724.
Perhaps SEIU’s new motto should be: “Socialism For Thee, Not Me.”
So Andy, if you aren’t willing to run your organization based on the beliefs you publicly espouse, please don’t impose them on us via government policy. The government, incidentally, your organization spent more than $60 million to elect.
Posted in Uncategorized Leave a comment
Gasbag-in-Chief: Obama’s Long-Winded Answers Will Wilt Far More Opponents Than Nuclear Weapons Ever Will
Just prior to Barack Obama announcing self-imposed conditions on if and when America would use nuclear weapons, he made a North Carolina audience wilt under a 17-minute response to a fairly simple question.
According to a rather humorous blog by the Washington Post’s Anne E. Kornblut, Obama meandered for 17 minutes and 2,500 words in response to a woman wondering if it was a “wise decision to add more taxes to us with the health care” reform. “We are over-taxed as it is,” she stated.

His best answer, from his perspective, would have simply been to have said, “Yes.” But he knows that’s not a popular answer. Instead, he kept talking, on and on, to the point where listeners no longer cared about what he was saying or why. They just want him to shut up.
His discursive answer – more than 2,500 words long — wandered from topic to topic, including commentary on the deficit, pay-as-you-go rules passed by Congress, Congressional Budget Office reports on Medicare waste, COBRA coverage, the Recovery Act and Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (he referred to this last item by its inside-the-Beltway name, “F-Map”). He talked about the notion of eliminating foreign aid (not worth it, he said). He invoked Warren Buffett, earmarks and the payroll tax that funds Medicare (referring to it, in fluent Washington lingo, as “FICA”).
Always fond of lists, Obama ticked off his approach to health care — twice. “Number one is that we are the only — we have been, up until last week, the only advanced country that allows 50 million of its citizens to not have any health insurance,” he said.
A few minutes later he got to the next point, which seemed awfully similar to the first. “Number two, you don’t know who might end up being in that situation,” he said, then carried on explaining even further.
“Point number three is that the way insurance companies have been operating, even if you’ve got health insurance you don’t always know what you got, because what has been increasingly the practice is that if you’re not lucky enough to work for a big company that is a big pool, that essentially is almost a self-insurer, then what’s happening is, is you’re going out on the marketplace, you may be buying insurance, you think you’re covered, but then when you get sick they decide to drop the insurance right when you need it,” Obama continued, winding on with the answer.
Halfway through, an audience member on the riser behind Obama yawned.
Oy. This really gets to the heart of America’s frustrations with Washington and politicians. Just give us a direct answer. We understand these are complex issues, but that doesn’t mean there can’t be simple, direct answers.
Even Obama seemed to recognize that he had gone on too long. He apologized — in keeping with the spirit of the moment, not once, but twice. “Boy, that was a long answer. I’m sorry,” he said, drawing nervous laughter that sounded somewhat like relief as he wrapped up.
But, he said: “I hope I answered your question.”
I don’t think you did, Mr. President. The taxpayers of America don’t appreciate filibustering and bloviating from politicians. That’s Beltway stuff – not middle America. They appreciate straight talk. Give it to us because we can tell when you don’t want to. If your agenda is what America really wants, you should have no qualms about giving us the dirty truth – unless, of course, the dirty truth about your agenda is worse than simply raising taxes.
Posted in Uncategorized 1 Comment
Noam Chomsky, ACORN-Sponsored Publication Advisor, Says “Right Wing” Setting U.S. on Path Towards Nazi Germany
For quite some time, Noam Chomsky has joined other radical luminaries on the “Editorial Advisory Group” of the ACORN-linked Social Policy magazine. Published by ACORN founder Wade Rathke, the magazine airs the views of Chomsky, Frances Fox Piven, Gloria Steinem, and Peter Dreier, among others.
This is the same publication that ran an analytical piece on Barack Obama’s 2004 primary campaign for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate, written by a Chicago ACORN leader.
The article contained such gems as: “By the time he ran for U.S. Senate, we were old friends.” The point is not to bring up President Obama’s apparently forgotten memories, but instead to point out Chomsky is not some nut that is isolated – he runs with the big dogs.
Chomsky recently painted a disturbing picture of America in the Russian news outlet Pravda, when he compared the opposition to President Obama and the Congress’ policies to what happened in Germany just prior to Adolf Hitler’s rise to power.
Chomsky, apparently, is referring to the Tea Party movement and other expressions of frustration with the direction of our country.
Chomsky makes outrageous claims that are indefensible. Frances Fox Piven recently criticized Glenn Beck, saying he made scapegoats out of people with “dark skin, foreigners and intellectuals.”
It’s only a matter of time before Chomsky’s opinions show up in the pages of Social Policy.
What Chomsky fails to point out, of course, is that Hitler and the Nazis sought a perfect socialist society through government policy, that is, supreme government control. It was not borne out of the belief of individual freedom and curtailed government spending, as are generally the principles of the Tea Party movement.
But Chomsky and his ilk can’t afford to let a few facts get in the way of some good old fashioned fear mongering. If there’s any scapegoating going on, it’s being done by Chomsky, Dreier, Piven and others who are claiming peaceful old people showing up to protest Medicare cuts are leading some sort of seditious movement.